ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
A. D. Krumbein, J. H. Ray
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 13 | Number 2 | June 1962 | Pages 166-170
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-A26145
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effect of control rod movement in a fast reactor has been calculated directly by solving a series of two-dimensional multigroup problems and indirectly by using a set of danger coefficients derived from one-dimensional calculations. The values of reactivity insertion calculated by the two methods for complete safety rod withdrawal agree within three percent. The shape of a curve of relative reactivity insertion vs. rod withdrawal distance is also predicted, with good agreement between the two methods. Differences between the two predictions are within three percent of the maximum value. Comparison of these predictions with a set of normalized experimental values shows agreement within four percent of the maximum value.