ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
July 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC cuts fees by 50 percent for advanced reactor applicants
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced it has amended regulations for the licensing, inspection, special projects, and annual fees it will charge applicants and licensees for fiscal year 2025.
A. D. Krumbein, J. H. Ray
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 13 | Number 2 | June 1962 | Pages 166-170
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-A26145
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effect of control rod movement in a fast reactor has been calculated directly by solving a series of two-dimensional multigroup problems and indirectly by using a set of danger coefficients derived from one-dimensional calculations. The values of reactivity insertion calculated by the two methods for complete safety rod withdrawal agree within three percent. The shape of a curve of relative reactivity insertion vs. rod withdrawal distance is also predicted, with good agreement between the two methods. Differences between the two predictions are within three percent of the maximum value. Comparison of these predictions with a set of normalized experimental values shows agreement within four percent of the maximum value.