ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Rubin Goldstein, E. Richard Cohen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 13 | Number 2 | June 1962 | Pages 132-140
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-1
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A treatment of resonance absorption intermediate between the usual narrow and wide resonance approximations is developed for homogeneous systems. An arbitrary parameter, λ, is introduced into the flux and two distinct approximations are employed to determine λ as a function of the resonance parameters. One is based upon a method of equating successive orders of approximation and the other is based upon a variational principle. Formulas are given, from which the resonance integral may be calculated. The parameter λ characterizes, in essence, the location between the narrow and wide resonance extremes, of the actual resonance. When λ is set equal to 0 or 1, the usual first order wide or narrow resonance integrals are obtained. Sample calculations are carried out for a good intermediate case (the 192 ev resonance of U238 in a 1:1 atomic mixture with hydrogen) using linear and nonlinear trial functions for both types of approximations. All results agree to within less than one percent of 0.172 barns. In comparison, the usual extreme energy-loss assumptions yield results which differ by more than a factor of 2 (0.121 barns for the narrow resonance approximation and 0.253 barns for the wide resonance approximation).