ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
G. S. Rosenberg, C. K. Youngdahl
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 13 | Number 2 | June 1962 | Pages 91-102
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-A26138
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The response of flat, thin, parallel, metal fuel elements to the loads imposed by the flow of coolant through reactor core passages is examined for the existence of plate divergence at velocities above a “critical” value. It is shown that small modifications of the simplifying assumptions used in the analysis produce a great difference in the conclusions regarding the possibility of divergence and the interpretation of the “critical” coolant velocity. The basic assumptions are the same as those of Miller (1), except that fluid inertia effects are included in the analysis of periodically supported plates. Although agreement exists between the results of the dynamic model of Section I and that of “neutral equilibrium” used by Miller, the additional consideration of fluid inertia leads to a different interpretation of “critical” velocity for periodically supported plates treated in Section II.