ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
G. S. Rosenberg, C. K. Youngdahl
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 13 | Number 2 | June 1962 | Pages 91-102
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-A26138
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The response of flat, thin, parallel, metal fuel elements to the loads imposed by the flow of coolant through reactor core passages is examined for the existence of plate divergence at velocities above a “critical” value. It is shown that small modifications of the simplifying assumptions used in the analysis produce a great difference in the conclusions regarding the possibility of divergence and the interpretation of the “critical” coolant velocity. The basic assumptions are the same as those of Miller (1), except that fluid inertia effects are included in the analysis of periodically supported plates. Although agreement exists between the results of the dynamic model of Section I and that of “neutral equilibrium” used by Miller, the additional consideration of fluid inertia leads to a different interpretation of “critical” velocity for periodically supported plates treated in Section II.