ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear Energy Strategy announced at CNA2026
At the Canadian Nuclear Association Conference (CNA2026) in Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson announced that Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is developing a new Nuclear Energy Strategy for the country. The strategy, which is slated to be released by the end of this year, will be based on four objectives: 1) enabling new nuclear builds across Canada, 2) being a global supplier and exporter of nuclear technology and services, 3) expanding uranium production and nuclear fuel opportunities, and 4) developing new Canadian nuclear innovations, including in both fission and fusion technologies.
G. G. Smith, J. Hardy, D. Klein, J. A. Mitchell
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 9 | Number 4 | April 1961 | Pages 421-429
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE61-A25906
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The relative U238 resonance capture integrals of 0.387-in. diameter UO2 and uranium metal fuel rods have been measured as well as the spatial distributions of the captures in each type of rod. The effective resonance integral of the UO2 rod was found to be 1.30 ± 0.02 times that of the . uranium metal rod. This difference is due to the lower density of uranium atoms and the presence of oxygen moderation in the UO2 fuel rod. The relative importance of each of these two effects was determined by means of U-Zr and U-Al alloy fuel rods. Of the 0.30 excess of the UO2 resonance capture integral over that of the uranium metal, 0.15 ± 0.02 was contributed by the lower U238 atom density of the UO2 rod, and the remaining 0.15 was attributed to oxygen moderation. Work done by Hellstrand (5) gives a value of 1.41 ± 0.03 for the U238 resonance capture integral for the UO2 rod relative to that of the uranium metal rod. Furthermore, by evaluating his expression for the resonance integral of a metal rod at a value of S/M corresponding to a “low-density” uranium metal rod (U238 atom density equal to that of the UO2 rod) of 0.387-in. diameter, one obtains a density effect of 1.32. These discrepancies can be attributed, at least partially, to a differing flux spectrum at energies above 30 kev in the present experiment as compared with Hellstrand's experiment. Whereas the high-energy flux is depleted in his experiment, there was an appreciable flux peak present in the TRX measurements.
