ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
John J. Volpe, D. Klein
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 8 | Number 5 | November 1960 | Pages 416-425
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE60-A25823
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Measurements of the relative U235 fission rates as a function of energy have been made for the TRX facility, a slightly enriched uranium, light water moderated critical assembly. The parameter directly measured is the ratio of the activity of a bare U235 foil to that of a similar foil enclosed in a box of absorbing material, which was either cadmium, boron, or gadolinium. The energy dependence associated with these ratios was obtained by the introduction of “effective cutoff energies” for the absorbing shields. A comparison is made with calculated values, based upon a simplified model for the neutron energy spectrum present, and the agreement is considered adequate.