ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
S. B. Gunst, J. C. Connor, E. Fast
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 8 | Number 2 | August 1960 | Pages 128-132
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE60-A25788
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In reactor-lifetime calculations it is customary to take account of the transient behavior of two fission-product poisons, Xe135 and Sm149, and to assume the gross poisoning due to all other products is a function of the total time-integrated exposure irrespective of the detailed flux history. This description tacitly assumes that the gross poisoning of the other products is stable. The adequacy of the description is demonstrated experimentally for a natural UO2 sample irradiated in a reactor flux of 2 × 1014 n/cm2-sec to an exposure of 6300 Mwd/ton. The poisoning associated with the so-called “stable” fission products is found to change only (−7 ± 3) barns/fission per year.