ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
NEUP honors young ANS members with R&D awards
Each year, the Department of Energy’s Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) recognizes graduate and undergraduate students for their innovative nuclear energy research. The winners of the Innovations in Nuclear Energy Research and Development Student Competition (INSC) receive honoraria along with travel and conference opportunities, including the chance to present their publications at the annual American Nuclear Society Winter Conference & Expo.
Jeffery Lewins
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 7 | Number 6 | June 1960 | Pages 481-486
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE60-A25754
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A surface perturbation method to determine reactivities is described which has application to the removal of reflectors, the lowering of water levels in reactors, the introduction of voided beam tubes, the insertion of black control rods, etc. A first-order approximation, using the unperturbed flux in the calculations, is shown to be in error for large perturbations. However, a simple one-energy expression is devised for the shape rather than the magnitude of the reactivity curve, that successfully predicts relative effects. The method is compared with an experimental determination of the reactivity worth of the variable upper reflector of the MITR.