ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Ricardo Diniz, Adimir dos Santos
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 152 | Number 2 | February 2006 | Pages 125-141
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE04-69
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A reactor noise approach has been successfully performed at the IPEN/MB-01 research reactor facility to determine experimentally the effective delayed neutron parameters i and i in a six-group model. The method can be considered a novel one because it exploits the very low-frequency domain of the spectral densities. The proposed method has some advantages to other in-pile methods since it does not perturb the reactor system and consequently does not "excite" any sort of harmonic modes. As a by-product and a consistency check, the eff parameter was obtained without the need of the Diven factor and power normalization, and it is in excellent agreement with independent measurements. The theory/experiment comparison shows that for the abundances the JENDL3.3 presents the best performance, while for the decay constants the revised version of ENDF/B-VI.8 shows the best agreement. The best performance for the eff determination is obtained with JENDL3.3. In contrast, ENDF/B-VI.8 and its revised version performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory overestimate eff by as much as 4%. The eff results of this work totally support the proposal by Sakurai and Okajima to reduce the thermal delayed neutron yield of 235U.