ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
Lewi Tonks
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 6 | Number 3 | September 1959 | Pages 202-213
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25660
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A quantitative but simple theory of the control effect of a uniformly distributed set of thermal poison elements in a hydrogen-moderated bare reactor core has been developed. Starting with plane parallel poison sheets, a zero-flux boundary condition, in a slab core and applying Fourier analysis, it has been possible to generalize to any boundary condition, to orthogonally intersecting sets of poison sheets in an infinite rectangular core, to control crosses, and cylindrical rods in regular array, to finite rectangular cores, and to finite cylindrical cores. Each element of the control array is associated with a cross-sectional area Ac within the core and within this area is an easily determined effective “absorption area” C. To a rather good accuracy the critical k of the controlled core is greater than the k of the uncontrolled core by the ratio Ac/(Ac − C). In this the theoretically based conclusion substantiates the intuitionally based and empirically confirmed methods worked out by Greebler (1), and by Pearlstein, Ruane, and Storm (2), and furnishes correction terms.