ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
Lewi Tonks
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 6 | Number 3 | September 1959 | Pages 202-213
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25660
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A quantitative but simple theory of the control effect of a uniformly distributed set of thermal poison elements in a hydrogen-moderated bare reactor core has been developed. Starting with plane parallel poison sheets, a zero-flux boundary condition, in a slab core and applying Fourier analysis, it has been possible to generalize to any boundary condition, to orthogonally intersecting sets of poison sheets in an infinite rectangular core, to control crosses, and cylindrical rods in regular array, to finite rectangular cores, and to finite cylindrical cores. Each element of the control array is associated with a cross-sectional area Ac within the core and within this area is an easily determined effective “absorption area” C. To a rather good accuracy the critical k of the controlled core is greater than the k of the uncontrolled core by the ratio Ac/(Ac − C). In this the theoretically based conclusion substantiates the intuitionally based and empirically confirmed methods worked out by Greebler (1), and by Pearlstein, Ruane, and Storm (2), and furnishes correction terms.