ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
A. Borella, K. Volev, A. Brusegan, P. Schillebeeckx, F. Corvi, N. Koyumdjieva, N. Janeva, A. A. Lukyanov
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 152 | Number 1 | January 2006 | Pages 1-14
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE06-A2557
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron capture cross section of thorium has been measured in the energy region between 4 and 140 keV at the GELINA time-of-flight facility of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements in Geel, Belgium. The gamma rays from capture events were detected by two C6D6 liquid scintillators, placed 14.37 m from the neutron source. The shape of the neutron flux was measured with a 10B-loaded ionization chamber. To obtain a detection efficiency independent of the gamma cascade and proportional to the total excitation energy, the pulse-height weighting technique was applied. The data have been normalized to the well-isolated and almost saturated 232Th resonance at 23.5 eV. The systematic uncertainties related to the normalization and weighting function, using an internal saturated resonance, are ~1.5%. An additional systematic uncertainty of 0.5% results from the self-shielding and multiple scattering corrections.Between 4 and 140 keV, our data are ~9 and 6.5% higher than the data of Kobayashi et al. and Macklin et al., respectively, and in good agreement with the data of Poenitz and Smith. Below 15 keV our data deviate by up to 30% from the data reported by Wisshak et al. Our data have been analyzed in terms of average level parameters. The resulting parameters are consistent with the resolved resonance parameters deduced from the transmission measurements of Olsen et al.