ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
Louis J. Barbieri, J. Wallace Webster, Ken Tang Chow
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 2 | February 1959 | Pages 105-119
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25563
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The economics and physics of plutonium recycle in the Calder Hall type reactor are considered. Three possible schemes of recycle are studied. In scheme A the plutonium produced in a run is blended with fresh natural uranium for a subsequent run; in scheme B the plutonium is alloyed with some diluent metal and fabricated into high heat-transfer elements more like MTR- or PWR-seed type elements and a subsequent load of fresh natural uranium elements is “spiked” with these plutonium elements; and in scheme C half the spent uranium is recycled as well as the plutonium. The conclusions are that scheme A will be the most economic means of recycle and will compete very favorably with the mode of operation where the plutonium is sold at the end of each run for $12 per gm. Viewed in another way, with natural uranium having its current value and lease charge, the fuel value of plutonium for recycling, with all costs considered, will be greater than $12 per gm. Schemes B and C do not look as attractive as A for the Calder Hall type reactor. The results are predicated on the assumption that the fuel elements will withstand exposure levels as high as 8800 Mwd/ton. This is beyond present experience, but it is believed that it is not unrealistic to assume that such exposures will be achieved in the future with improved fuel elements. A matrix-analytic solution to the differential equations governing isotopic concentrations as functions of flux-time is also developed.