ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
B. J. Toppel
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 2 | February 1959 | Pages 88-98
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25561
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A common method used to determine reactivity is to measure the reactor period and then refer to the inhour equation which relates asymptotic period to reactivity. The implicit assumption in such a method is that the neutron population is varying exponentially with time. The conditions necessary for this assumption to be valid have been obtained by a quantitative examination of the time behavior of the neutron population. The results obtained show that under common experimental conditions, several minutes may be required following a positive step change in reactivity in order to achieve accuracy by means of a period determination. In addition, in the case of the reactor with a constant extraneous source, a significant increase in this waiting time can result even if the reactor is initially only very slightly subcritical. Whereas in principle both positive and negative reactivities may be obtained from period observations, it is pointed out that in practice serious objections exist for the case of negative reactivities.