ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear Energy Strategy announced at CNA2026
At the Canadian Nuclear Association Conference (CNA2026) in Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson announced that Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is developing a new Nuclear Energy Strategy for the country. The strategy, which is slated to be released by the end of this year, will be based on four objectives: 1) enabling new nuclear builds across Canada, 2) being a global supplier and exporter of nuclear technology and services, 3) expanding uranium production and nuclear fuel opportunities, and 4) developing new Canadian nuclear innovations, including in both fission and fusion technologies.
Jack Chernick, Russel Vernon
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 4 | Number 5 | November 1958 | Pages 649-672
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE58-A25554
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two basic formulas for resonance absorption applicable both to mixtures and to lumps are considered, the narrow resonance (NR) approximation and the infinite mass (NRIA) approximation. The formulas are shown to be complementary, yielding accurate results when the choice between them is based on the practical width of the resonance line as originally suggested by Wigner. The formulas are used to calculate resonance integrals for U238 and Th232. The results yield a low mass absorption term and a surface absorption term proportional to the square root of the surface-to-mass ratio for lumps of practical size in qualitative agreement with the experimental work of Egiazarov and Hellstrand for U238 and with Dayton and Pettus for thorium. Dresner’s suggestion that the ratio of the resonance integral to the mass absorption term is independent of the resonance structure is not borne out. Refinement of the basic formulas is discussed. The correction of the NRIA formula for energy degradation is in agreement with Spinney’s calculations for U-H mixtures and with Monte Carlo results obtained by Auerbach for uranium-water lattices. Consideration of lumping effects indicates that the basic formulas generally underestimate the resonance absorption. It is therefore recommended that the common use of ill-defined flux disadvantage factors be dropped.