ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Martin A. Lopez de Bertodano, Jian-Feng Shi,Stephen G. Beus
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 126 | Number 1 | May 1997 | Pages 108-114
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE97-A24462
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
New experimental data are obtained for pressure drop and entrainment for annular upflow in a vertical pipe. The 9.5-mm pipe has a hydraulic diameter similar to the subchannels in the fuel assemblies of water-cooled reactors. The test section has a length-to-diameter ratio of 440 to ensure fully developed annular flow. The pressure covers the range from 140 to 660 kPa. Therefore, the density ratio is varied by a factor of ∼4. This allows the investigation of the effect of pressure on the interfacial shear models. Gas superficial velocities between 25 and 126 m/s are tested, extending the range of previous data to higher gas velocities. The data are compared with well-known models for interfacial shear that represent the state of the art. Good results are obtained with the models by Wallis, and Henstock and Hanratty. When the model by Asali, Hanratty, and Andreussi is modified for the effect of pressure, the agreement is also good, and the data collapse with very little scatter. There is a close relationship between these models and mixing length theory such that the models may be viewed as correlations for the surface roughness. This points toward a more fundamental approach in terms of the interfacial structure.