ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Martin A. Lopez de Bertodano, Jian-Feng Shi,Stephen G. Beus
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 126 | Number 1 | May 1997 | Pages 108-114
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE97-A24462
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
New experimental data are obtained for pressure drop and entrainment for annular upflow in a vertical pipe. The 9.5-mm pipe has a hydraulic diameter similar to the subchannels in the fuel assemblies of water-cooled reactors. The test section has a length-to-diameter ratio of 440 to ensure fully developed annular flow. The pressure covers the range from 140 to 660 kPa. Therefore, the density ratio is varied by a factor of ∼4. This allows the investigation of the effect of pressure on the interfacial shear models. Gas superficial velocities between 25 and 126 m/s are tested, extending the range of previous data to higher gas velocities. The data are compared with well-known models for interfacial shear that represent the state of the art. Good results are obtained with the models by Wallis, and Henstock and Hanratty. When the model by Asali, Hanratty, and Andreussi is modified for the effect of pressure, the agreement is also good, and the data collapse with very little scatter. There is a close relationship between these models and mixing length theory such that the models may be viewed as correlations for the surface roughness. This points toward a more fundamental approach in terms of the interfacial structure.