ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC proposes changes to its rules on nuclear materials
In response to Executive Order 14300, “Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,” the NRC is proposing sweeping changes to its rules governing the use of nuclear materials that are widely used in industry, medicine, and research. The changes would amend NRC regulations for the licensing of nuclear byproduct material, some source material, and some special nuclear material.
As published in the May 18 Federal Register, the NRC is seeking public comment on this proposed rule and draft interim guidance until July 2.
W. J. M. de Kruijf, A. J. Janssen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 123 | Number 1 | May 1996 | Pages 121-135
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE94-108
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Calculations of resonance absorption for simple temperature profiles both in a slab and in a pin of 238UO2 are presented to show the influence of a nonuniform fuel temperature profile on the choice of the equivalent uniform temperature, or the effective fuel temperature. The effective fuel temperature is given as a weighted average of the temperatures in the fuel zones. Two simple theoretical expressions for this weighted average, derived from the literature, are discussed. First, for high absorption, the effective fuel temperature is given by the so-called chord-averaged fuel temperature. Second, for low absorption, the effective fuel temperature is given by the volume-averaged fuel temperature. The results for a slab of 238UO2 show that a bruteforce method is necessary to calculate an accurate effective fuel temperature. A set of weights for one specific 238UO2 pin is calculated. This set agrees well with the chord-averaged fuel temperature. However, this appears to be a coincidence because the results for specific neutron energy ranges do not agree with this set of weights.
