ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
W. J. M. de Kruijf, A. J. Janssen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 123 | Number 1 | May 1996 | Pages 121-135
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE94-108
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Calculations of resonance absorption for simple temperature profiles both in a slab and in a pin of 238UO2 are presented to show the influence of a nonuniform fuel temperature profile on the choice of the equivalent uniform temperature, or the effective fuel temperature. The effective fuel temperature is given as a weighted average of the temperatures in the fuel zones. Two simple theoretical expressions for this weighted average, derived from the literature, are discussed. First, for high absorption, the effective fuel temperature is given by the so-called chord-averaged fuel temperature. Second, for low absorption, the effective fuel temperature is given by the volume-averaged fuel temperature. The results for a slab of 238UO2 show that a bruteforce method is necessary to calculate an accurate effective fuel temperature. A set of weights for one specific 238UO2 pin is calculated. This set agrees well with the chord-averaged fuel temperature. However, this appears to be a coincidence because the results for specific neutron energy ranges do not agree with this set of weights.