ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
W. J. M. de Kruijf, A. J. Janssen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 123 | Number 1 | May 1996 | Pages 121-135
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE94-108
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Calculations of resonance absorption for simple temperature profiles both in a slab and in a pin of 238UO2 are presented to show the influence of a nonuniform fuel temperature profile on the choice of the equivalent uniform temperature, or the effective fuel temperature. The effective fuel temperature is given as a weighted average of the temperatures in the fuel zones. Two simple theoretical expressions for this weighted average, derived from the literature, are discussed. First, for high absorption, the effective fuel temperature is given by the so-called chord-averaged fuel temperature. Second, for low absorption, the effective fuel temperature is given by the volume-averaged fuel temperature. The results for a slab of 238UO2 show that a bruteforce method is necessary to calculate an accurate effective fuel temperature. A set of weights for one specific 238UO2 pin is calculated. This set agrees well with the chord-averaged fuel temperature. However, this appears to be a coincidence because the results for specific neutron energy ranges do not agree with this set of weights.