ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Edward W. Larsen, J. E. Morel, John M. McGhee
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 123 | Number 3 | July 1996 | Pages 328-342
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE123-328
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The multigroup P1 and simplified PN (SPN) equations are derived by an asymptotic expansion of the multigroup transport equation with anisotropic scattering. The P1 equations are the leading-order approximation in this expansion; the SPN equations for N = 2,3,… are increasingly higher order approximations. The physical assumptions underlying these approximations are that the material system is optically thick, the probability of absorption is small, and the mean scattering angle is not close to unity. For multigroup isotropic scattering transport problems, a dispersion analysis is given that verifies the accuracy of the SPN approximations. Numerical comparisons of P1, SPN, and SN solutions are also given. These comparisons show that for low N, SPN solutions are significantly more accurate (transportlike) than P1 solutions and are obtained at a significantly lower computational cost than SN solutions.