ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
C. Lombardi, A. Mazzola
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 122 | Number 2 | February 1996 | Pages 229-239
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24157
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The plutonium that comes from dismantled warheads and that is already stockpiled from commercial fuel reprocessing has raised many proposals for its burning in a safe and economical manner. The utilization is examined of current pressurized water reactors (PWRs) that are partially fed with a nonfertile oxide-type fuel, while the rest of the core is still fed with standard 235U-enriched fuel. The unconventional fuel consists of PuO2 diluted in an inert matrix, which should be highly radiation resistant, scarcely neutron absorbent, and chemically stable and which allows the final disposal of the discharged fuel without any treatment. Commercial PWRs operating in a once-through cycle scheme can transmute 97 to 99% of239Pu and 71 to 84% of total initially loaded reactor- and weapons-grade plutonium, respectively. The remnant plutonium is in a proliferation-resistant condition. The high initial reactivity of the plutonium-bearing rods causes a high initial rod power peak and continuously decreasing power generation in these rods during the irradiation. A less pronounced rod power peak in UO2 rods at end of life has to be addressed. The reactivity coefficients are, in absolute terms, slightly lower than the standard UO2 fuel ones.