ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Robert P. Rulko
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 121 | Number 3 | December 1995 | Pages 371-392
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE95-A24141
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Historically, the even-order PN equations have been considered a less accurate approximation to the transport equation than the odd-order PN-1 equations. This perception has stemmed from two apparent conceptual difficulties imposed by the even-order PN methods— the difficulty in prescribing rigorous boundary conditions for even-order PN equations that contain the odd number of angular flux moments and the discontinuous character of the even-order PN solutions at material interfaces. With the first one of the mentioned even-order PN conceptual problems, a presentation is made of a straightforward and physically-motivated variational procedure based on a new functional that leads from a multigroup planar geometry transport problem to a multigroup P2 problem with clearly and rigorously defined multigroup boundary conditions. These boundary conditions are new and allow neutron transfer between energy groups at the boundary. These boundary conditions are tested by comparing P2, P1, and SN calculations. Our results show that in the test problems considered, the multigroup P2 equations with variational boundary conditions are always more accurate than the P1 multigroup equations with Federighi-Pomraning or Marshak boundary conditions applied to each energy group.