ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Robert P. Rulko
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 121 | Number 3 | December 1995 | Pages 371-392
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE95-A24141
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Historically, the even-order PN equations have been considered a less accurate approximation to the transport equation than the odd-order PN-1 equations. This perception has stemmed from two apparent conceptual difficulties imposed by the even-order PN methods— the difficulty in prescribing rigorous boundary conditions for even-order PN equations that contain the odd number of angular flux moments and the discontinuous character of the even-order PN solutions at material interfaces. With the first one of the mentioned even-order PN conceptual problems, a presentation is made of a straightforward and physically-motivated variational procedure based on a new functional that leads from a multigroup planar geometry transport problem to a multigroup P2 problem with clearly and rigorously defined multigroup boundary conditions. These boundary conditions are new and allow neutron transfer between energy groups at the boundary. These boundary conditions are tested by comparing P2, P1, and SN calculations. Our results show that in the test problems considered, the multigroup P2 equations with variational boundary conditions are always more accurate than the P1 multigroup equations with Federighi-Pomraning or Marshak boundary conditions applied to each energy group.