ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Robert P. Rulko
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 121 | Number 3 | December 1995 | Pages 371-392
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE95-A24141
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Historically, the even-order PN equations have been considered a less accurate approximation to the transport equation than the odd-order PN-1 equations. This perception has stemmed from two apparent conceptual difficulties imposed by the even-order PN methods— the difficulty in prescribing rigorous boundary conditions for even-order PN equations that contain the odd number of angular flux moments and the discontinuous character of the even-order PN solutions at material interfaces. With the first one of the mentioned even-order PN conceptual problems, a presentation is made of a straightforward and physically-motivated variational procedure based on a new functional that leads from a multigroup planar geometry transport problem to a multigroup P2 problem with clearly and rigorously defined multigroup boundary conditions. These boundary conditions are new and allow neutron transfer between energy groups at the boundary. These boundary conditions are tested by comparing P2, P1, and SN calculations. Our results show that in the test problems considered, the multigroup P2 equations with variational boundary conditions are always more accurate than the P1 multigroup equations with Federighi-Pomraning or Marshak boundary conditions applied to each energy group.