ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Bingjing Su, G. C. Pomraning
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 120 | Number 2 | June 1995 | Pages 75-90
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE95-A24109
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The problem of describing particle transport through a Markovian stochastic mixture of two immiscible materials is generally approximated by the so-called Levermore model, consisting of two coupled transport equations. In this paper, the P2 diffusive equations and the associated boundary conditions for this Levermore model are derived in planar geometry by using a variational principle, and numerical results comparing P2, P1, and S16 (benchmark) calculations are presented. These results demonstrate that the P2 equations are considerably more accurate than the P1 equations away from boundary layers. An asymptotic diffusion approximation to this model is also explored with several different boundary conditions, and the overall conclusion is that the asymptotic diffusion treatment is in general inferior to P2 theory, and its superiority over P1 theory is not overwhelming and not consistent.