ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Bingjing Su, G. C. Pomraning
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 120 | Number 2 | June 1995 | Pages 75-90
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE95-A24109
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The problem of describing particle transport through a Markovian stochastic mixture of two immiscible materials is generally approximated by the so-called Levermore model, consisting of two coupled transport equations. In this paper, the P2 diffusive equations and the associated boundary conditions for this Levermore model are derived in planar geometry by using a variational principle, and numerical results comparing P2, P1, and S16 (benchmark) calculations are presented. These results demonstrate that the P2 equations are considerably more accurate than the P1 equations away from boundary layers. An asymptotic diffusion approximation to this model is also explored with several different boundary conditions, and the overall conclusion is that the asymptotic diffusion treatment is in general inferior to P2 theory, and its superiority over P1 theory is not overwhelming and not consistent.