ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
James W. Bryson, John C. Lee, Jeré A. Hassberger
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 114 | Number 3 | July 1993 | Pages 238-251
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A24037
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two methods are presented for optimally calculating spatial distributions of neutron flux in a nuclear reactor core. Both techniques, Kalman filtering and maximum likelihood estimation, simultaneously account for all initial information contained in the nominal core specifications and in-core measurements, as well as all of the uncertainties within the system, to provide a minimum variance estimate of neutron flux. These methods resolve discrepancies in the initial information in a statistically optimal manner, thereby providing valuable insight into the nature of the optimal solution obtained. Despite radically different algorithms, both methods yield the same minimum variance estimate for the quantity of interest. The algorithms have been successfully tested for one-dimensional axial and two-dimensional x-y flux mapping problems with simulated in-core data sets.