ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
I. Soares, W. F. Miller, Jr., R. T. Perry
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 114 | Number 2 | June 1993 | Pages 160-167
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A24028
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The viability of the use of the ONEDANT discrete ordinates code for the calculation of the Doppler coefficient of reactivity for a pressurized water reactor is investigated. The ONEDANT results are compared with benchmark results from a Monte Carlo code, MCNP-3A. A comparison with the results obtained using the CELL-2 and WIMS-AECL codes is also included. The influences of certain variables, such as spatial mesh, SN angular quadrature order, interaction convergence criterion, boundary conditions, PN order, and number of energy groups, are analyzed. An alternative benchmark calculation to the Monte Carlo result is attempted to provide some feel for the approximate accuracy of the Monte Carlo calculation. Such an alternative answer is important when less approximate methods are compared with these results.