ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
I. Soares, W. F. Miller, Jr., R. T. Perry
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 114 | Number 2 | June 1993 | Pages 160-167
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A24028
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The viability of the use of the ONEDANT discrete ordinates code for the calculation of the Doppler coefficient of reactivity for a pressurized water reactor is investigated. The ONEDANT results are compared with benchmark results from a Monte Carlo code, MCNP-3A. A comparison with the results obtained using the CELL-2 and WIMS-AECL codes is also included. The influences of certain variables, such as spatial mesh, SN angular quadrature order, interaction convergence criterion, boundary conditions, PN order, and number of energy groups, are analyzed. An alternative benchmark calculation to the Monte Carlo result is attempted to provide some feel for the approximate accuracy of the Monte Carlo calculation. Such an alternative answer is important when less approximate methods are compared with these results.