ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
INL makes first fuel for Molten Chloride Reactor Experiment
Idaho National Laboratory has announced the creation of the first batch of enriched uranium chloride fuel salt for the Molten Chloride Reactor Experiment (MCRE). INL said that its fuel production team delivered the first fuel salt batch at the end of September, and it intends to produce four additional batches by March 2026. MCRE will require a total of 72–75 batches of fuel salt for the reactor to go critical.
Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuhisa Matsumoto
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 114 | Number 1 | May 1993 | Pages 64-75
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A24015
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A formula for the uncertainty of core performance parameters based on a combination of the cross-section adjustment and bias factor methods has been derived. The formula is compared with those derived from the cross-section adjustment method and the bias factor method used separately. When the method error correlation is strong between the critical assemblies and a target core, the combined method is superior to the cross-section adjustment method used alone. The combined method is, in general, superior to the bias factor method used alone. Numerical results are presented for the uncertainties of keff, the control rod worth, and the power distribution of a large fast reactor. The combined method yields a smaller uncertainty for the control rod worth calculated in dollar units than the cross-section adjustment method used alone.