ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
Edgar Kiefhaber
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 111 | Number 2 | June 1992 | Pages 197-204
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23933
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For high-accuracy criticality calculations, one should take into account the difference in the energy distributions between prompt and delayed fission neutrons. In steady-state reactor calculations, it is usually assumed that delayed and prompt neutrons are emitted with the same energy distribution. This approximation may lead to systematic deviations in keffof between −0.2 and +0.05%. While for typical cores of liquid-metal-cooled fast reactors and corresponding critical assemblies the effect is usually fairly small, it may become more important for low-enriched k∞ experiments and for highly enriched, high-leakage cores. For group cross-section adjustment procedures usually covering a wide range of critical assemblies with fairly different nuclear characteristics, a proper treatment of the energy distributions of delayed neutrons could be particularly important for excluding systematic differences as far as possible.