ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Min Lee, Jan Sea Wu
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 111 | Number 1 | May 1992 | Pages 82-101
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23925
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Releases of radionuclides and the production of aerosols during the molten core/concrete interaction (MCCI) phase of degraded core accidents in light water reactors are termed “ex-vessel releases.” The VANESA and METOXA codes were respectively developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Industrial Degraded Core Rulemaking (IDCOR) program to quantify ex-vessel releases. Comparison of calculations by VANESA and METOXA (under identical initial and boundary conditions) show that except for niobium and strontium species, the predicted ex-vessel radionuclide release rates are within an order of magnitude of each other. In an actual application of these two codes to the source term quantification of severe accidents, the initial and boundary conditions for the calculations could be significantly different, as demonstrated in an analysis of an anticipated transient without scram accident sequence in a boiling water reactor. For the same amount of debris, the MCCI thermal-hydraulic results provided for METOXA from a DECOMP calculation tend to drive more radioactive material from the debris pool than those provided for VANESA from a CORCON/MOD2 calculation. The MAAP code, however, predicts that less mass is involved in the MCCI.