ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Min Lee, Jan Sea Wu
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 111 | Number 1 | May 1992 | Pages 82-101
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23925
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Releases of radionuclides and the production of aerosols during the molten core/concrete interaction (MCCI) phase of degraded core accidents in light water reactors are termed “ex-vessel releases.” The VANESA and METOXA codes were respectively developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Industrial Degraded Core Rulemaking (IDCOR) program to quantify ex-vessel releases. Comparison of calculations by VANESA and METOXA (under identical initial and boundary conditions) show that except for niobium and strontium species, the predicted ex-vessel radionuclide release rates are within an order of magnitude of each other. In an actual application of these two codes to the source term quantification of severe accidents, the initial and boundary conditions for the calculations could be significantly different, as demonstrated in an analysis of an anticipated transient without scram accident sequence in a boiling water reactor. For the same amount of debris, the MCCI thermal-hydraulic results provided for METOXA from a DECOMP calculation tend to drive more radioactive material from the debris pool than those provided for VANESA from a CORCON/MOD2 calculation. The MAAP code, however, predicts that less mass is involved in the MCCI.