ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
T. J. Downar, H. Khalil
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 109 | Number 3 | November 1991 | Pages 278-296
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE91-A23853
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The uncertainty in the burnup reactivity swing δkb attributable to nuclear data uncertainties is analyzed using depletion-dependent sensitivity coefficients for single- and multicycle equilibrium depletion. Four systems are analyzed with design features that encompass many of the design options considered for current U.S. advanced liquid-metal reactor cores. These systems, while characterized by very different δkb values in the range from —0.22 to 3.87% Δk, exhibit much smaller differences in their δkb uncertainties, which range from 0.18 to 0.33% Δk. The δkb uncertainties depend primarily on the design choices of core size and fissile fuel type, as well as whether the analysis represents multicycle effects. For all reactors analyzed, the burnup swing uncertainty is dominated by the 238U capture reaction. The potential for reducing uncertainties by a factor of 3 by use of available integral experiment results is also demonstrated.