ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
C. Y. Fu
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 109 | Number 1 | September 1991 | Pages 18-25
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE91-A23841
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Pairing corrections in particle-hole (exciton) state-density formulas used in precompound nuclear reaction theories are, strictly speaking, dependent on the nuclear excitation energy U and the exciton number n. A general formula for (U, n)-dependent pairing corrections was derived earlier for the exciton state-density formula for a system of one kind of fermion. A similar derivation is made for a system of two kinds of fermions, a system in which neutrons and protons occupy different sets of single-particle states. It is shown that the constant-pairing-energy correction used in standard statedensity formulas, such as U0 in Gilbert and Cameron, is a limiting case of the present general (U, n)-dependent results. Spin cutoff factors are calculated using the same pairing theory and parameterized into an explicit (U, n)-dependent function, thereby defining the exciton level-density formula for two kinds of fermions. The results show that the ratios in the exciton level densities in the one- and two-fermion approaches vary with both U and n, thus, most likely leading to differences in calculated compound-to-precompound ratios. However, the differences in the spin cutoff factors in the two cases are found to be rather small.