ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
W. E. Abbott, E. J. Allen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 108 | Number 3 | July 1991 | Pages 278-288
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE91-A23825
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two new difference schemes are derived for numerically solving the transport equation in spherical geometry. The first difference method is positive; i.e., the calculated fluxes are never negative. Furthermore, for the first method, the error expansion is suitable for applying Richardson extrapolation with respect to both spatial and angular variables to increase the accuracy of the approximate fluxes. Numerical experiments illustrate the accuracy obtained using this procedure, as well as demonstrate that the accuracy of the second difference method is significantly improved through application of Richardson extrapolation. In addition, the numerical results indicate that the second method is significantly more accurate than the standard nonextrapolated diamond-difference method for numerically solving the transport equation in spherical geometry.