ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
G. Flamenbaum, A. Zaetta, M. Martini, M. Michenot, T. Newton, H. Sztark
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 106 | Number 1 | September 1990 | Pages 64-68
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE90-A23758
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several experiments on Superphénix are used to compare calculations and measurements for various control rod configurations that show salient spatial effects: 1. “local criticality” configurations (i.e., in a subcritical reactor with all rods inserted, adjacent control rods are successively withdrawn up to criticality) 2. criticality achieved with one control rod curtain up and the other remaining fully inserted 3. “handling error” configurations (i.e., all rods inserted except one, which is supposed to be replaced by a fuel subassembly). These experiments and their analysis are described. The calculation-to-experiment comparison shows a good agreement.