ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
G. Flamenbaum, R. de Wouters, A. Le Bourhis, T. Newton, G. Vambenepe
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 106 | Number 1 | September 1990 | Pages 11-17
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE90-A23752
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The loading of the Superphénix core took place between July 20 and October 3, 1985. The loading of the first core, involving 5.7 tonnes of plutonium, employed a new strategy in the pattern of fuel/dummy assembly replacement moves, known as the checkerboard pattern. This pattern proved highly satisfactory; significant counting rates were obtained on the low-power chambers early in the loading; overall loading time was reduced; and the interpretation of measurements was facilitated., The results were in good agreement with precalculated values, which were reconfirmed by a further, more detailed interpretation that took into account the actual conditions at the time of the reload. The reactivity differences between calculated and measured values for the first critical core loading (containing 33 dummy assemblies) and the fully loaded power core were –0.12 and –0.02% A k/k, respectively. This agreement between experimental and calculated values demonstrates the satisfactory performance of the data sets and methods used in the analysis.