ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
G. Flamenbaum, R. de Wouters, A. Le Bourhis, T. Newton, G. Vambenepe
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 106 | Number 1 | September 1990 | Pages 11-17
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE90-A23752
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The loading of the Superphénix core took place between July 20 and October 3, 1985. The loading of the first core, involving 5.7 tonnes of plutonium, employed a new strategy in the pattern of fuel/dummy assembly replacement moves, known as the checkerboard pattern. This pattern proved highly satisfactory; significant counting rates were obtained on the low-power chambers early in the loading; overall loading time was reduced; and the interpretation of measurements was facilitated., The results were in good agreement with precalculated values, which were reconfirmed by a further, more detailed interpretation that took into account the actual conditions at the time of the reload. The reactivity differences between calculated and measured values for the first critical core loading (containing 33 dummy assemblies) and the fully loaded power core were –0.12 and –0.02% A k/k, respectively. This agreement between experimental and calculated values demonstrates the satisfactory performance of the data sets and methods used in the analysis.