ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
G. Flamenbaum, R. de Wouters, A. Le Bourhis, T. Newton, G. Vambenepe
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 106 | Number 1 | September 1990 | Pages 11-17
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE90-A23752
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The loading of the Superphénix core took place between July 20 and October 3, 1985. The loading of the first core, involving 5.7 tonnes of plutonium, employed a new strategy in the pattern of fuel/dummy assembly replacement moves, known as the checkerboard pattern. This pattern proved highly satisfactory; significant counting rates were obtained on the low-power chambers early in the loading; overall loading time was reduced; and the interpretation of measurements was facilitated., The results were in good agreement with precalculated values, which were reconfirmed by a further, more detailed interpretation that took into account the actual conditions at the time of the reload. The reactivity differences between calculated and measured values for the first critical core loading (containing 33 dummy assemblies) and the fully loaded power core were –0.12 and –0.02% A k/k, respectively. This agreement between experimental and calculated values demonstrates the satisfactory performance of the data sets and methods used in the analysis.