ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
R. N. Hill, K. O. Ott
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 103 | Number 1 | September 1989 | Pages 12-24
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23656
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A review of worldwide results reveals that reaction rates in the blanket region are generally underpredicted with the discrepancy increasing with penetration; however, these results vary widely. Experiments in the large uniform Purdue University Fast Breeder Blanket Facility blanket yield an accurate quantification of this discrepancy. Using standard production code methods (diffusion theory with 50-group cross sections), a consistent calculated-to-experimental (C/E) drop-off is observed for various reaction rates. A 50% increase in the calculated results at the outer edge of the 51-cm blanket is necessary for agreement with experiments. The usefulness of refined group constant generation, utilizing specialized weighting spectra, and transport theory methods in correcting this discrepancy is analyzed. Refined group constants reduce the discrepancy to half that observed using the standard method. The surprising result is that transport methods have no effect on the blanket deviations; thus, the present multigroup transport theory does not constitute or even contribute to an explanation of the blanket discrepancies. The residual blanket C/E drop-off (about half the standard drop-off) using advanced methods must be caused by approximations that are applied in all current multigroup methods.