ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
R. N. Hill, K. O. Ott
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 103 | Number 1 | September 1989 | Pages 12-24
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23656
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A review of worldwide results reveals that reaction rates in the blanket region are generally underpredicted with the discrepancy increasing with penetration; however, these results vary widely. Experiments in the large uniform Purdue University Fast Breeder Blanket Facility blanket yield an accurate quantification of this discrepancy. Using standard production code methods (diffusion theory with 50-group cross sections), a consistent calculated-to-experimental (C/E) drop-off is observed for various reaction rates. A 50% increase in the calculated results at the outer edge of the 51-cm blanket is necessary for agreement with experiments. The usefulness of refined group constant generation, utilizing specialized weighting spectra, and transport theory methods in correcting this discrepancy is analyzed. Refined group constants reduce the discrepancy to half that observed using the standard method. The surprising result is that transport methods have no effect on the blanket deviations; thus, the present multigroup transport theory does not constitute or even contribute to an explanation of the blanket discrepancies. The residual blanket C/E drop-off (about half the standard drop-off) using advanced methods must be caused by approximations that are applied in all current multigroup methods.