ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
L. B. Freeman, B. R. Beaudoin, R. A. Frederickson, G. L. Hartfield, H. C. Hecker, S. Milani, W. K. Sarber, W. C. Schick
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 102 | Number 4 | August 1989 | Pages 341-364
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23647
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The light water breeder reactor (LWBR) operated at the Shippingport Atomic Power Station from 1977 to 1982, serving the electric power grid for the Greater Pittsburgh area. The LWBR was a pressurized water reactor (PWR) with several unique features: It was designed and proved to be a breeder with an end-of-life fissile fuel content ∼1.3% greater than beginning of life; the reactor used the 233U-Th fuel system; and it had a large Doppler coefficient, low reactivity worth of transient xenon, and a significant reactivity effect from transient 233Pa. There were no control rods or soluble poison, and reactivity was controlled by movable fuel. Core operations went extremely well. The design lifetime of 18 000 effective full-power hours was exceeded by 60% by utilizing a gradual reduction in power level. The overall capacity factor was 65%. Physics experiments showed good agreement with predictions of movable fuel reactivity worth, most temperature coefficients, breeding, power distribution, and xenon stability. Unexpected results occurred in measurements of flow coefficient of reactivity, zero power temperature coefficients early in life, and bred fissile fuel distribution. The LWBR technology has demonstrated that water-cooled breeder reactors can operate in existing water power plants much like conventional PWRs.