ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
D. Ferenc, B. Antolković, G. Paić, M. Zadro, S. Blagus
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 101 | Number 1 | January 1989 | Pages 1-7
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23590
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A metallic 9Be target was bombarded with 14.6-MeV neutrons. Double-differential cross sections were measured for the (n, α) reaction in the angular range from 0 to 100 deg. The measured alpha-particle spectra and complementary neutron spectra from the literature were analyzed in terms of a combination of sequential and simultaneous breakups. The results show that ∼50% of the total inelastic cross section is due to simultaneous breakup n + 9Be → n + α + 5He, while the remainder is mainly due to neutron inelastic scattering to the three excited states of 9Be: 2.43, 6.76, and 11.28 MeV. This analysis gives evidence of the validity of the constant matrix element model and contradicts evaluations that ignore the simultaneous breakup contributions.