ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
B. M. Rothleder
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 100 | Number 4 | December 1988 | Pages 479-489
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A23581
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Measurements made during cycle 1 operation of Commonwealth Edison Company’s Zion Unit 2 pressurized water reactor core were used to validate the Electric Power Research Institute Advanced Recycle Methodology Program. In addition to the usual reaction rate and axial trace measurements for determining power distributions, gamma scan measurements were available to provide additional data to validate the calculated power shapes. The parallel occurrence of gamma scan measurements and standard nuclear instrumentation measurements provided a unique opportunity to intercompare the results of these measurement methods. The calculated X-Y gamma scan behavior supported the behavior of the calculated X-Y reaction rates. The measured X-Y gamma scans were found to be more accurate than the measured X- Y reaction rates, with the latter showing significant differences among some symmetrically located assemblies. For both types of measurement, however, the modeling of the asymmetrically loaded assembly located furthest in the core periphery produced the poorest results. The axial gamma scan calculation proved very accurate except at the inlet and outlet regions.