ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
P. Barbucci, G. Mariotti, N. Cerullo, P. Riscossa+ A. Cesana, M. Terrani, G. Sandrelli
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 100 | Number 4 | December 1988 | Pages 467-478
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A23580
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analysis of the neutron transport in the region around the Caorso [a 2600-MW(thermal) boiling water reactor] reactor pressure vessel and the streaming through three penetrations of the sacrificial shield, located at various distances from the reactor core midplane, was performed. The DOT 4.2 and MORSE codes were used to evaluate the neutron flux levels and spectra in several locations, some of which are very far from the neutron source. The calculational methodology used for this analysis is described, and the results are compared with those of some measurements carried out at the Caorso power station during the second cycle of operation using the multiple foil activation technique. A comparison shows that the agreement is good from both the neutron total flux and energy distribution points of view. Possible reasons for some observed discrepancies are discussed.