ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
T. G. Theofanous, B. Najafi, E. Rumble
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 97 | Number 4 | December 1987 | Pages 259-281
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE87-A23512
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A variety of probabilistic models to quantify the likelihood of steam-explosion-induced (α-mode) containment failure from core melt accidents in commercial light water reactors have been proposed in the past. In many respects, these models and associated mechanistic considerations were complementary. Based on this and taking into account recent research efforts in this area, we perceived a need to consolidate a common approach. A new probabilistic framework is proposed for this purpose. Quantification of all inputs required by this framework is carried out, with the support of three companion parts of the study, for the case of a low-pressure core melt scenario in a pressurized water reactor (neglecting multiple explosions). The results support the generally prevalent expectation that steam explosions do not pose a significant threat to containment. To fully appreciate the qualitative limitations on this result all four parts must be carefully studied.