ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
M. S. Ash, G. Yanow
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 55 | Number 3 | November 1974 | Pages 342-344
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE74-A23460
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In certain atomic physics experiments performed in conjunction with underground nuclear-weapon testing, it is desired that radiation energy converter plates be irradiated so as to reemit a maximum amount of radiation. The plates, composed of thin layers of materials of differing atomic number, are to be designed by choosing the material atomic number for each layer so that the plate, in toto, produces minimum photoelectron kinetic energy. Minimum photoelectron kinetic energy implies maximum energy reradiated, in the context of the radiation energy spectral regime of interest. The optimum choice of layer atomic numbers involves the solution of a novel variational problem where the minimizing function, the atomic numbers, take on integer values only. A comparison is made between the optimally designed plate and the corresponding homogeneous plate in terms of photoelectron kinetic energy produced. The homogeneous plate produces more than two orders of magnitude more photoelectric kinetic energy than does the optimally designed plate.