ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
D. C. Hunt, Robert E. Rothe
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 53 | Number 1 | January 1974 | Pages 79-92
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE74-A23331
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In evaluating fissile-material recovery operations involving metal salvage immersed in a reagent, a criticality safety engineer must be able to identify systems of minimum critical mass. Further, he must know the effect on the reproduction factor caused by changes in process variables such as container size or the fissile concentration of the reagent. This paper reports no new experimental results but studies the criticality aspects of fissile-metal immersion by analyzing the most applicable of the existing measurements. The results are expressed in terms of the critical mass of the metal region (excluding the mass of fissile material in solution) as a function of the fissile concentration and dimensions of the liquid cylinder., The analysis indicates that the critical mass of practical combinations of uranium metal and uranium solution always exceeds that of an 18.7-g/cm3, 93.2% 235U-enriched uranium sphere centered in a 300-g/liter metal-water mixture. The corresponding conservative approximation for plutonium systems holds for a 19.7-g/cm3, 95% 239Pu sphere in a 200-g/liter metal-water mixture. The upper limit of applicability of these results is 500 g/liter for both plutonium and uranium systems. The calculational techniques described in this paper underestimate critical masses of uranium by ∼5%; the calculated masses of plutonium are sufficiently overestimated to be conservative in practical applications.