ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
John Paul Kuspa, Nick Tsoulfanidis
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 52 | Number 1 | September 1973 | Pages 117-123
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE73-A23294
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Buildup factors for gamma rays traversing slab shields have been obtained using the Monte Carlo method. Secondary particles produced inside the shield were taken into account, with special attention given to the contribution of bremsstrahlung which is produced by electrons and positrons. The results indicate that annihilation gamma rays from pair production do increase the buildup factor a little, but that the bremsstrahlung contribution is much more pronounced. The contribution of bremsstrahlung to the dose buildup factor reaches 33% of its total value for 8-MeV gamma rays traversing 5 mean-free-paths of lead. For single-material shields, the results agree well with the experiment. For double-material shields, comparison with experiment is not possible due to the lack of such data.