ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
Seppo Salo
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 50 | Number 1 | January 1973 | Pages 46-52
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE73-A22587
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
There have been some weak points in the use of modern control theory in xenon shutdown problems. The aim of this paper is to show how Pontryagin’s maximum principle should be applied to these problems. To do this, two special problems have been picked up and solved completely. It is shown that the solution to the energy optimal xenon shutdown problem of Rosztoczy is not a bang-bang control as proposed by Rosztoczy even when the xenon restraint is omitted. The actual optimum control includes a phase with continuously varying control. Further, numerical examples are given to show that the difference in the costs between the optimum control and the control proposed by Rosztoczy is negligible. The other problem considered is the energy optimal xenon shutdown of Lewins et al. It is shown that the solution can be found analytically which gives a slight improvement to their analysis.