ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
Zbigniew Weiss
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 48 | Number 3 | July 1972 | Pages 235-247
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A22482
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In one-dimensional systems which consist of N nodes, the two N response matrix equations for the partial currents through the node interfaces have been transformed into a set of N three-point equations with the total in-current per node as the new variable. The resulting coefficients which describe the coupling between neighboring nodes are expressed in terms of the reflection and transmission matrices of the invariant imbedding theory. These coupling coefficients can be compared with those of other nodal equations. In the case of slab geometry this has been illustrated by a direct comparison with the familiar finite difference formulation with the average flux per node as the dependent variable. Also the relation between the method presented here and the so-called rigorous finite difference equations has been established. The advantage of this method lies in the fact that the flexibility of the response matrix methods—which describe the nodes in terms of invariant imbedding concepts—has been condensed into the conventional three-point finite difference scheme, for which many well-established solution methods exist.