ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
W. N. McElroy, R. J. Armani, E. Tochilin
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 48 | Number 1 | May 1972 | Pages 51-71
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A22456
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Previously reported inconsistencies between activation detector and n, p scattering/time-of-flight (TOF) measurements of the thermal-neutron-induced 235U fission spectrum prompted a comparison of such measurements in the core center and on the surface of a bare 235U assembly, referred to as Godiva. For the present study, TOF measurements and multiple foil measurements of the core and surface spectra of the APFA-III-Godiva are compared. Comparison of the integral fluxes above specified energies for the two methods shows agreement to within ∼5% at core center. Results obtained at in. from the core surface, however, show disagreement between the multiple foil and TOF (and previously reported photo-plate data) which is similar to that found for measurements in the fissionspectrum. Results for the fission spectrum are re-analyzed using the same evaluated energy-dependent cross sections as used for the Godiva study but with a larger number of foil reactions than previously available. A Monte Carlo error analysis code is used for the assignment of errors for the activation results for the Godiva and fission spectrum studies. It is concluded that if the activation measurements of the Godiva and fission spectrum remain firm, and significant changes in current evaluated reaction cross sections are not effected, then increases up to as much as 10 to 15% in the mean energy of the Godiva leakage and fissionspectrum must be considered.