ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Hiroshi Motoda
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 46 | Number 1 | October 1971 | Pages 88-111
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE71-A22338
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A generalized treatment for investigating the effects of various refueling schemes on the optimal control rod programming that maximizes the average burnup of discharged fuels in a two-region, radially one-dimensional light water moderated nuclear reactor is presented and applied to a boiling water reactor having uranium fuel of a single 235U enrichment. It is assumed that the refueling scheme has reached an equilibrium fuel cycle, and the analysis by burnup space is applied, which helps in interpreting geometrically the coupled effect of the control rod programming and the fuel burnup by the trajectory drawn in this space. Three refueling schemes are considered: parallel, series out-in, and series in-out. Scatter loading is assumed in each region and the batch number and volume fraction of each region are varied as the refueling parameters. Fuel management and poison management constitute a hierarchy relation, and the effect of the refueling schemes on burnup maximization or enrichment minimization is several times greater than that of the control rod programmings. However, the policy of the optimal control rod programming strongly depends on the refueling scheme. The power density of the inner region should be as high as possible for out-in scheme (inner high policy) and vice versa for in-out scheme (outer high policy). However, either policy can be optimal, depending on the refueling parameters for parallel schemes, and in some cases the optimal control rod programming is not unique (degenerate policy). Optimal control rod programming increases the discharge burnup or decreases the enrichment of the feed fuels by about 0 to 4% over the conventional constant power shape operation. The difference is mainly determined by the reactor design and the refueling scheme. Optimal refueling should be chosen from among parallel schemes, which have much larger freedom than series schemes.