ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Guohui Zhang, Zhaomin Shi, Guoyou Tang, Jinxiang Chen, Guangzhi Liu, Hanlin Lu
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 137 | Number 1 | January 2001 | Pages 107-110
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE01-A2179
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Based on analyses of previous experimental methods and results, the cross sections of the 186W(n, )187W reaction were measured in the neutron energy range from 0.50 to 1.50 MeV by the activation technique. Neutrons were produced through the T(p,n)3He reaction, and the cross sections of the 197Au(n, )198Au reaction were used to determine the absolute neutron flux. Experimental results agreed with the previous time-of-flight measurements but did not agree with the previous activation measurements. Without the tungsten resonance absorption foils, the measured cross sections of the 186W(n, )187W reaction by the activation method were shown to be larger than the corrected ones because of the interference of the low-energy neutrons.