ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Do Heon Kim, Hangbok Choi, Won Sik Yang, Jong Kyung Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 137 | Number 1 | January 2001 | Pages 23-37
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE01-A2173
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effect of DUPIC fuel composition heterogeneity on CANDU core performance was assessed for three candidate DUPIC fuel options: the fissile content adjustment method, reactivity control by slightly enriched and depleted uranium, and reactivity control by natural uranium. The fissile content adjustment method produces DUPIC fuel of fixed 235U and 239Pu contents, while the reactivity control method produces DUPIC fuel of uniform reactivity at the fresh condition. To assess the uncertainty of the core performance parameter associated with the isotopic variation, the sensitivity coefficients were generated by the generalized perturbation theory for the lattice parameter and zone controller level perturbations. The uncertainty was then estimated for three key core performance parameters: maximum channel power (MCP), maximum bundle power (MBP), and channel power peaking factor (CPPF). The fissile content adjustment method was shown to have a smaller uncertainty in the core performance parameter than with the reactivity control options. For the fissile content adjustment method, the average uncertainties of MCP, MBP, and CPPF were estimated to be 1.3, 2.5, and 1.2%, respectively, with 95% confidence level, when simulated for specified burnup points of the equilibrium core.