ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
Ken Nakajima, Masanori Akai, Takenori Suzaki
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 116 | Number 2 | February 1994 | Pages 138-146
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE94-A21489
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The modified conversion ratio is defined as the ratio of 238U captures to total fission. Gamma-ray spectrometry of irradiated fuel rods has been introduced to measure this quantity in two types of water-moderated low-enriched UO2 cores: the standard core, called the 1.42S core, and a tight-lattice core, called the 0.56S core. The water moderator-to-fuel volume ratios Vm/Vf of the cores are 1.420 and 0.564, respectively. As no activation foil is used in this method, no corrections are needed for the neutron self-shielding and neutron flux depression that are caused by such a foil. Instead, the gamma-ray self-shielding effect due to the fuel rod must be corrected. The modified conversion ratio is measured by this method are 0.457 for the 1.42S core and 0.724 for the 0.56S core. The errors in the experimental results are estimated to be∼3%. Computer analyses using the VIM continuous-energy Monte Carlo code with the JENDL-2 library show that the calculated value is ∼6% larger than the experimental one for the tight-lattice 0.56S core.