ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Y. Ikeda, E. T. Cheng, C. Konno, H. Maekawa
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 116 | Number 1 | January 1994 | Pages 28-34
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE94-A21478
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The activation cross sections for the 99Tc(n,p)99Mo, 99Tc(n,α)96Nb, 99Tc(n,n′α)95Nb, and“Tc(n,n′)99mTc reactions at 13.5 and 14.8 MeV have been measured by using the deuterium-tritium neutron generator (the Fusion Neutronics Source) at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute. The results were compared with experimental values from the literature, evaluated activation cross-section files, and predictions by current cross-section computer codes. Special emphasis was placed on the feasibility of producing high-specific-activity“Mo, to be used in medical applications, via the 99Tc(n,p)99Mo reaction in the Fusion Material Irradiation Facility. A factor of 3 overestimate of 99Mo production resulted when the REAC *2 code was used. It is suggested that this discrepancy is due primarily to the factor of 5 difference in cross sections at the 14-MeV region between the REAC*2 data and the current measurement.