ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
S. Pelloni
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 82 | Number 4 | December 1982 | Pages 458-461
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A21459
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this Note a new iterative method for solving the monoenergetic diffusion equation is presented. Experience has shown that the usual iterative methods used to solve the resulting equations either do not converge at all or the number of inner iterations becomes too large when a high-order approximation is used for the spatial flux. Our aim therefore has been to develop a new iterative method that leads to a small number of iterations even for a high order of spatial flux approximation. The present method is additionally expedited using Chebyshev or Wagner and Andrzejewski procedures, which are compared.The SAPHIR benchmark test case with a fixed volume source was used for calculations because it is difficult to converge. It is shown that the present method needs almost the same number of iterations for Lagrangian flux approximation of first to fourth order. This number is smaller than 53. The Chebyshev procedure, which was the most effective, halved the number of inner iterations.