ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
S. Pelloni
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 82 | Number 4 | December 1982 | Pages 458-461
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A21459
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this Note a new iterative method for solving the monoenergetic diffusion equation is presented. Experience has shown that the usual iterative methods used to solve the resulting equations either do not converge at all or the number of inner iterations becomes too large when a high-order approximation is used for the spatial flux. Our aim therefore has been to develop a new iterative method that leads to a small number of iterations even for a high order of spatial flux approximation. The present method is additionally expedited using Chebyshev or Wagner and Andrzejewski procedures, which are compared.The SAPHIR benchmark test case with a fixed volume source was used for calculations because it is difficult to converge. It is shown that the present method needs almost the same number of iterations for Lagrangian flux approximation of first to fourth order. This number is smaller than 53. The Chebyshev procedure, which was the most effective, halved the number of inner iterations.